Subscribe
Studio

Demystifying mastering: Adam Ayan talks tech and his stellar career to date

Adam Ayan, founder of Ayan Mastering, boasts a client list as vast as it is stellar, featuring the likes of Paul McCartney, Foo Fighters, Katy Perry, Bob Marley, Taylor Swift, Madonna, Nirvana, Bruce Springsteen, and Gwen Stefani to name a mere few. Here, he talks to Headliner about the art of mastering, how he fell in love with the process, and how Merging Technologies has shaped his work.

When did you first develop an interest in audio?

I started out as a musician and as a kid played in rock bands and thought that I'd be a professional musician. I had an experience with one of my bands going into a recording studio and cutting a demo in a small multi-track studio and I really enjoyed that experience. When it came time for me to move on from high school, I decided I would go to school for both music performance and sound recording and there was this great program at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell that covered both of those bases. Basically, the degree I ended up getting was in music performance and sound recording technology and as I started to get into the audio and studio part of it I knew that’s where I wanted to go.

While I was at University, I also worked part-time at a small project studio where I cut my teeth as a young engineer and quickly got into the driver's seat with clients. At that time I was recording and mixing and became really interested in mastering, which is what I ended up following for virtually all of my career.

What were the first steps in your career outside of university?

Out of school I ended up interning at a mastering studio in the Boston area, which led to a job there I then ended up with a job at Gateway Mastering and I've just followed that as my career path ever since.

Why did mastering hold such an appeal for you?

I think it's the overview that you get as a mastering engineer, or the viewpoint that you have within that part of the creative process. Firstly, the fine tuning really spoke to me. As a mastering engineer you’re hearing it as a whole, as opposed to a recording engineer. What spoke to me was that I could hear it and affect it at the very end of the process. I hear the whole arrangement, the whole recording is done, the mix is done.

How much room for creativity is there in the mastering process?

There is more creativity involved than most know. There are certain things that we just can’t do at all in mastering, like changing the mix etc. so the creative tools end up usually coming down to equalisation and dynamics processing. In a way, the mastering engineer can take the baton from the mix engineer to finish things up and there's usually a fair bit of room for creativity there.

One of the other great things about being a mastering engineer is you get to work on a large swathe of recordings, much more so than producers or recording and mix engineers, just by nature of the work. All of that work takes infinitely more time than it does for me to master. So, where a record producer might work on a handful of records a year, because they might take weeks and months or longer, I'm working on a handful of records a day sometimes.

Is working on a vast range of songs spanning styles and genre different or more challenging than working on an album by a single artist?

They're vastly different from each other, and the expectations from one artist or producer to the next can be very different. For instance, with a lot of Latin music there's often a lot of percussive elements, and one of the last things you want to do is anything that might round off those transients and those edges. On records that are sung in French, whether they be records in, marketed in markets like, like francophone markets, the vocal tends to be a little louder and a little brighter than we're used to with American pop music, so you need to be sensitive to that. If that happens on an American record, maybe I would do things to bring the voice down a little bit, but I know that this market dictates a certain thing.

Equally, working on 10 songs for one artist can have its own complications. Sometimes those 10 songs could be three or four different producers, four different engineers, three or four different studios and they’ve all been made over a long period of time. So, it has its own set of things that you need to get through in terms of making it sound like one cohesive album.

Tell us about how Ayan Mastering came together.

Ayan Mastering started in July 2023. I spent 25 years at Gateway Mastering Studios, also here in Portland Maine, and had my own mastering room for 22 of those years, developing a reputation and clientele. I knew Gateway was going to come to an end at some point and in late 2022, the owner, Bob Ludwig, said he was retiring and that it would be closing. I knew I would continue mastering records as long as people were willing to hire me, and I have a lot of exceptionally great clients, so I started my own studio.

There is more creativity involved in mastering than most know. Adam Ayan

Tell us about your relationship with Merging Technologies and how they figure you’re your workflow?

I’ve been using Merging products since 2005. It started with the Pyramix system. Essentially, I use the Pyramix for final assembly and final master output of all my masters and Pyramix fit the bill right off the bat back then and continues to do so today. In 2005 at Gateway I was the first to get onto that platform, figuring out the best way to utilise it, and I fell in love with it pretty early on. Then in 2006 I got the rest of our studio on to it, and I've been using it ever since. I brought that along with me to Ayan Mastering. I have a total of three Pyramix systems that run on turnkey CPUs that they put together for us several years ago. One is my main system that I use in my mastering room, one is a system that my assistant uses, and then I have a third system at home so that I can do last-minute things there.

It does things no other system does as well. Precision editing of two track audio, stereo audio, is key in mastering. De-clicking and things like that can be done really well in the Pyramix. Today, the king of distribution is digital. So, for every project we output various file formats for streaming. But we also still output formats for CD, vinyl, lacquer cuts, and all the various formats that our clients require for final masters. All come out of the Pyramix and it does them really well.

That was the start for me, and I eventually got on to their hardware as well. That started with the Horus around 2010, mainly listening for its AD/DA conversions and seeing at the time if it was comparable to the kind of AD/DA processing we were using then, and it was beating processors. We immediately switched over to Horus and I use it to this day.

I also own a Hapi, which is like the light version of the Horus, and I absolutely love the conversion process in both of those units. And after Ayan Mastering started, I bought a third Pyramix system and the Anubis. They are fantastic. I have one for the rig that my assistant uses and one on my rig at home. So, I'm using a number of Merging products because it all just sounds amazing.

How did you find the Anubis when you first started using it?

Well, I wish I was making the most of everything it can do, because it can do so much. At the moment I'm really using them as a glorified headphone amplifier and their headphone amplifier is exceptional, that's why I wanted to get them. I knew they'd play well with the Pyramix systems in terms of their integration and with the Ravenna network. It’s really a super clean monitor path for headphones and for doing quality control.

With the Anubis I have at home is the same thing. I can do editing or quality control if I need to, knowing that I have this great monitor path. But I'm just using the headphone amplifier. But there is just so much it can do. You have the Talk Back option, you can put line level into it, you can put a microphone level into it. It really is incredible.